logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.09 2014가합505531
손해배상(건)
Text

1. Of the instant litigation, the part between the Plaintiff and Defendant Mechanical Construction Mutual Aid Association is September 6, 2016 of this Court.

Reasons

1. On September 6, 2016, this Court shall pay 70,000 won to the Plaintiff until September 30, 2016; Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall pay 27,000,000 won to the Plaintiff; and Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall pay 27,000,000 won to the said money in collaboration with Defendant Mutual Aid Association; and cancellation of November 16, 2016’s settlement recommendation as to Defendant Mutual Aid Association shall be 104,00,000 won shall be paid; Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall pay 34,00,000,000 won out of the said money in collaboration with Defendant Mutual Aid Association; Defendant Mutual Aid Association shall pay 20,000,000 won to the remainder of the above amount calculated by the Plaintiff’s settlement recommendation as 160,000,0000 won in addition to the above amount; Defendant Mutual Aid Association shall pay the remaining amount of 36,010,000,000 won.

The instant lawsuit is not an essential co-litigation, but an ordinary co-litigation, which requires a consolidated determination of legal relationship. In light of the purport of the decision, such as the case where a separate confirmation is denied in the decision of recommending a compromise, or where the matters prescribed in the said decision are under the premise that they form a common legal relationship to co-litigants, it is separate in light of the purport of the decision.

arrow