1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) The Seongbuk-gu Seoul shall be a multi-household house (4 households) with the second floor of the ground brick slves roof in Seongbuk-gu Seoul.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the plaintiff was ordered No. 1-A on November 14, 2017 between the defendant and the plaintiff.

According to the fact that the lease contract of this case was concluded on November 22, 2017 to November 21, 2019 with the condition that the lease contract of this case shall be sub-leaseed as KRW 134,580 per month (hereinafter referred to as the "lease contract of this case") from November 22, 2017 to the Defendant by leasing the real estate stated in the Paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "real estate of this case"), the Defendant is obligated to pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 134,580 per month, which is equivalent to the rent of this case, from November 22, 2019 to the completion date of delivery of the real estate of this case, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on November 21, 2019.

The defendant's assertion that the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim until the dispute with the owner or owner of the real estate of this case is terminated. However, the defendant's defense is not sufficient to block the plaintiff's claim. Thus, the defendant's defense is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.