beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged [criminal record] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of taking property in breach of trust at the Seoul High Court on February 12, 2010 and one year and six months for the same year.
5. 27. The above judgment became final and conclusive around 27.
[2] The Defendant was the chairman of the general assembly and the board of directors of the “C Housing Redevelopment Project Promotion Committee” that is composed of the residents of Suwon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Redevelopment Project District, who reside above the land of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Housing Redevelopment Project District, and the president of the C Redevelopment Cooperative approved from December 20, 2007. However, around February 25, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court suspended the authority of the head of the above association from that time after receiving a decision to suspend the performance of duties.
Nevertheless, the Defendant provided the victim E with the authority to implement the C development project and received money from him. On May 20, 2008, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim and the victim on February 15, 2008 with the title "the redevelopment project calendar contract" as the victim and the victim on February 15, 2008, within the office of the head of the C development partnership located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.
The above contract was entered into with the victim as the head of the C-Development Cooperative, with the following qualifications: (a) the defendant is qualified as an executor on behalf of the C-Development Cooperative establishment promotion committee, (b) vicarious execution of the business affairs, (c) vicarious execution of the business affairs, (d) vicarious execution of the business affairs, (e) execution of the business affairs related to the authorization of management and disposal, (e.g., vicarious execution of the business affairs related to the selection of the collaborative entity, and (e) execution of the business affairs related to the holding of various general meetings, and (e) payment of the total of KRW 72,722,750,000 per square year in return for service performance;
The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, was the victim, and around 18, 200,000 won under the name of the cost and operating expenses for the conclusion of the contract around May 20, 2008, and around 18, 2008.