logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.11.15 2011가합29708
매매대금
Text

1. The plaintiffs, plaintiffs (Withdrawal) mutual savings banks, Gyeongdo Savings Bank, Gyeongdo Savings Bank, and stock company.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Escocoia Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Escoia”) is an executor of the construction and sale of housing facilities in the first 378-1 unit (hereinafter referred to as “instant project site”) for the purpose of the Gyeonggi-si in Yang-si, the parties to the dispute (hereinafter referred to as “Escoia”) are the owners of the construction and sale of the housing facilities in the second 378-1 unit (hereinafter referred to as “instant project site”) and the owners of the Defendant Daesung-dong branch (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Daesung branch owners”) entered into a construction contract with Escoia on October 22, 2007 with the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff (Withdrawal). The Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”) are Usco savings banks, Ksco Savings Bank, one stock company, and the preceding day of the mutual savings banks (hereinafter referred to as “the mutual savings banks, etc.”) to raise funds for the purchase of the instant project site.

Defendant Daesung Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Daesung Industrial”), was partially divided and established on June 29, 2010 from the Defendant Dae Sung Dong-dong Co., Ltd.

In accordance with the instant agreement, the Plaintiff (Withdrawal), U.S. Mutual Savings Bank, Gyeong Savings Bank, and one of the savings banks, during the course of the instant lawsuit, transferred the claims stated in the purport of the claim against the Defendants to the succeeding Intervenor Korea Asset Management Corporation, and withdrawn from the lawsuit.

B. On the same day as the date of conclusion of the above sub-party loan agreement, each party’s roles, scope of duties, contents of responsibility, etc. for the smooth promotion of the instant project (hereinafter “instant agreement”) were entered into with the Plaintiffs, etc. of the instant agreement and sub-party loan, the executing company, the Simco, and the Defendant Daesung, the Simsung, the contractor, etc., on which the instant agreement and sub-party loan were entered into. According to this, Maain is liable when certain conditions are met.

arrow