logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.12.06 2018고정97
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 1.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2017, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) arbitrarily printed out the “D Joint Representative Director A and E” in the column of power delegation of litigation using a computer at the attorney-at-law C law office located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si; and (b) affixed the corporate seal of D Co., Ltd. prepared next to the printing.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation of litigation in the name of D Co., Ltd., a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, exercised the power of attorney for a forged lawsuit, to the employees of the said legal office who are aware of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the text of the Act and subordinate statutes in 15372 at 2017 Gohap 15372, a copy of a contract for the same business as an agent, a certificate of all registered matters, a copy of the complaint, and support for

1. The intent of the above Article 231 of the Criminal Act regarding the crime and the selection of punishment (the Article 231 of the Private Document, the defendant's power of attorney without the consent of E is recognized, and the defendant thought that the preparation of power of attorney of a private document corresponds to the benefit of E;

Even if it does not affect the establishment of intention, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Code (the exercise of the above investigation document), and the choice of each fine.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On July 2012, the Defendant, at the attorney C law office located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (hereinafter “C law office”), voluntarily stated that “F and Gumi-si G” was “F and Gumi-si” in the letter of delegation of the lawsuit at the attorney C law office located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (hereinafter “C law office”), and affixed the F seal prepared next thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation of litigation in F, a private document related to rights and obligations.

(b) the exercise of a warning document on July 2012;

arrow