A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 1. 7. 05:30 경 평택시 C에 있는 D 나이트 앞길에서 우연히 눈이 마주친 E과 싸움을 하던 중 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 평택경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경장 G로부터 “ 사건 경위를 확인하려 하니 가까이 와 달라.” 는 말을 듣자 느닷없이 “ 뭘 오라고 해 ”라고 소리를 지르며 위 G의 턱 부위를 손으로 잡아 밀치고 울대 부위를 손으로 움켜잡았다.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers who were performing legitimate duties concerning the processing of 112 reports and criminal investigations, thereby obstructing the execution of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order (within the scope of recommended sentence guidelines);

1. Application of the sentencing criteria - Scope of the recommended sentence: Class 1 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties and Forced Performance of Duties). The mitigation area (one month to August);

2. Determination of sentence - Determination of sentence - Recognition of crime and reflectivity, records of crime (for the last ten years, only one time prior to a fine, and one time prior to a punishment for interference with the performance of official duties, but only 17 years prior to a fine), the degree of assault is relatively minor, and the punishment is determined as ordered, taking into account all the kinds of sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the circumstances leading to the instant crime and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.