All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the Defendant’s grounds for final appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of forced indecent conduct on April 16, 2016 among the facts charged of the instant case did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, as alleged in the grounds of final appeal

2. The lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty on the grounds of the Prosecutor’s final appeal on April 16, 2016, on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the part of the instant facts charged, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on forced indecent conduct, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of

3. The final appeal by the Defendant and the Prosecutor is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.