logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.01.18 2016고단2092
의료법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are siblings; Defendant A, from December 9, 2014 to May 31, 2016, operated a “D” business establishment located in Pyeongtaek-si C; Defendant B, who received the above business establishment from Defendant A, a punishment, around June 1, 2016, and operated from August 2, 2016.

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the Medical Service Act shall open a massage place unless he/she is a massage doctor;

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a massage doctor, the same year from April 1, 2016 to the same year.

5. From the date of March 31, 200, a place of massage business was established by employing a female national E with no qualification certificate as an employee, and allowing an unspecified number of customers to engage in a single-hour eating place, 50,000 won in the case of a eating place and 70,000 won in the case of a eating place, and to take charge of or divide the telegraph of customers.

(b) No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner without the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

1) On March 25, 2016, from around May 31, 2016 to around May 31, 2016, the Defendant agreed to pay an amount equivalent to 10% of the monthly salary of 140,000 won and the marina expenses paid by customers, and employed as a massage for marina business.

2) The Defendant, from May 15, 2016 to May 31, 2016, employed the Defendant as a massage club of the mother country F, and G, who entered the said D marina business establishment as a visa for short-term stay under the same conditions.

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

2. Defendant B

A. 1) Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a massage doctor, the Defendant was transferred from June 1, 2016 to June 16 of the same month, and was employed by Thailand’s nationality women E, F, G, and H as a marina branch who did not hold a qualification as a massage doctor upon transfer from A of the said D marina branch from around June 1, 2016 to employment as an unspecified person in the same manner as Paragraph 1(a).

arrow