1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a company that provides multiple universities with “C” service (hereinafter “instant service”); and the Defendant works for the Plaintiff from July 17, 2017 to October 20, 2017.

After retirement, the Plaintiff, a competitor, retired from employment as D (hereinafter referred to as D).

For three months, the defendant actively sought information on the plaintiff's C Program while working for the plaintiff, leaving his/her job, and leaked the plaintiff's trade secret as shown in the attached Form D.

The plaintiff becomes aware of the defendant's divulgence of the plaintiff's trade secret through anonymous informant, and asked the defendant whether he was employed D, but the defendant did not perform his duties related to the university.

Before the retirement of the plaintiff, the defendant was presumed to have left the above program, E, and the defendant's comprehensive information about the plaintiff acquired at the time of the plaintiff's retirement was sent to E, and then E was prepared to leave the job to D.

In addition, the defendant recommended FF, G, etc. who worked for the plaintiff to leave the plaintiff and leave his job D, and in fact, F, G, etc. left D after the plaintiff's retirement.

In light of the above acts of the defendant, it is clear that the defendant leaked the above information of the plaintiff in D, and due to the above acts of the defendant, 26 universities, which were originally the plaintiff's customers, entered into a contract with D after termination of the contract with the plaintiff after retirement of the defendant.

Accordingly, the plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to the claim amount.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by infringement of trade secrets and leakage of business data, such as the attached Form.

2. The Defendant is working for the Plaintiff from July 17, 2017 to October 20, 2017.

After retirement, the Plaintiff’s severance from employment to D, and D’s similar services to the instant services to the university.