beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 8, 2017 to February 13, 2019 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s relationship 1) were legally married couples who completed the marriage report on May 30, 2008, and the agreement was married on October 20, 2009. 2) The Defendant maintained de facto marital relations with the Plaintiff even thereafter, and was living together with the Plaintiff on June 18, 2015, and went to Dong-gu C Apartment-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2015.
3) On November 18, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking consolation money and division of property due to de facto marriage destruction under the Daejeon Family Court’s Support 2015ddan4167, and the said lawsuit is in progress. (B) The Defendant was registered in the name of the Defendant on July 6, 2015 at the C Apartment Ddong Underground Parking Lot (hereinafter “instant options”). However, around 00:00 on July 6, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff used a F observer car (hereinafter “instant options”).
2) At around 20:00 on July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was registered in the name of the Defendant in front of the H campus located in Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the street; (b) but is actually occupied and used by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant car”).
3) The Defendant was indicted by the Daejeon District Court 201Kadan1206 on September 2, 2016 and sentenced one year of suspended execution and 40 hours of community service order to the effect that he/she interfered with the exercise of his/her right on September 2, 2016. The Defendant appealed against this, but the Defendant’s appeal was dismissed on August 17, 2017.
Daejeon District Court 2016No2515) The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 13-18, 19, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 5-1, 2, the purport of the whole pleadings]
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The options of the instant case and the instant car engine (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant vehicles”) are only the Defendant in the name of the Plaintiff.