1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. All plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

3. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.

1. Determination as to the claim filed by the Plaintiff A Cmerio ELD (hereinafter “Plaintiff Company”).

A. As to the defense of this case, the defendant asserted to the effect that the lawsuit of this case by the plaintiff company is unlawful, since it is not a juristic person that actually exists for the plaintiff company, or there is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff company was not qualified to have filed the lawsuit of this case,

Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 18, and 19 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the overall purport of the arguments, the plaintiff company is a foreign corporation established under the English-style Ireland Company Act as the applicable law on February 3, 2012 with USD 50,000 in its capital stock and USD 50,000 in its principal place of business as "YY G," and the Chinese nationality H was a shareholder who has acquired 50,00 shares issued by the plaintiff company as the representative of the plaintiff company on February 3, 2012, and H was appointed an attorney-at-law as the legal representative on behalf of the plaintiff company on February 24, 2014, and filed the lawsuit in this case on January 9, 2015. The plaintiff company can recognize the fact that the contract content was performed by entering into a construction contract with the defendant and opened a deposit account in the Hong Kong branch in the HS and received the aforementioned account from the defendant.

According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff company is a corporation established in the United Kingdom of Great Britain, which is a corporation established in the United Kingdom of Ireland, and is deemed to be effective as the subject of rights and obligations, such as entering into a contract with the defendant and implementing it. H filed the lawsuit in this case as the representative of the plaintiff company, and therefore the defendant'

B. (1) On August 16, 2011, the Defendant, who operates D with respect to the merits, was contracted from J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) for the construction of Jeju LLC 4 factory processing works, a Chinese subsidiary (hereinafter “E”).

(B) On March 12, 2012, the Plaintiff Company: (a) the instant construction that the Defendant received from J on March 12, 2012, was decked, decked.