logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.01.18 2017고단286
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On March 18, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on June 12, 2006. On October 12, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on October 12, 2007. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one year and two months and seven million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on February 26, 2014, and completed the sentence in Daegu District Court on December 22, 2016.

[2] Although Defendant 1 had the power to be punished as a crime of violating the Traffic Act on the road as seen above four occasions, Defendant 2 driven a motor vehicle with C low speed in the section of about 1 km from the Gu-si in the front and front of the Dong-dong in the Gu-si in the state of alcohol concentration of 0.208% during the period of repeated crime at around 22:5 on August 13, 2017, when he was under the influence of alcohol at around 0.208% during the period of repeated crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a report on the circumstances of the driver involved in driving and inquiring about the results of crackdown on drinking;

1. Criminal records as stated in the judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, or a criminal investigation report (Attachment to a judgment) attached to the summary order and the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was a repeated crime due to a special injury, etc., and the crime of this case was committed again at the time when two months have not yet passed since the record of punishment as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act was four times in the past.

arrow