A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on April 20, 2017, the Defendant argued that “D” adjacent to the main highway D, adjacent to the main highway in the Sinsi-si, U.S.A., would depth crops with each other, and that the victim took the head of the Defendant with the rear part of the fluenite ( approximately 98cm in length, about 16cm in part of the day). The Defendant, who fludddddddd the brue of the victim’s head, fladd the body of the victim with the head of the victim’s head, and fladd the victim’s hand, flading the victim’s hand, and flading the victim’s hand and arms, etc. as above.

Accordingly, the Defendant, using the above head of the Dong, which is a dangerous object, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a dynasium, face, dynasium, multiple dynasium, and multiple dynasium, including four or more dynasiums that require treatment for about six weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act to be forfeited - Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant: The risk of committing the instant crime and the degree of injury that are relatively heavy by using a saf, which is a dangerous object, in many cases the head, hand, arms, etc. of the victim;

(k) failure to agree with the victim;

- The circumstances favorable to the defendant: A contingent crime that was committed by a person who was assaulted first from the victimized person, was found to be erroneous, and was seriously reflected. There is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime since 1993. - In full view of other matters that are conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the defendant's age, environment, family relationship, etc.