The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant was a person who served as an officer of the D Council, a consultative body for occupants of the apartment complex C, and was admitted to the Internet NAF under the name of “F” operated by the victim E; (b) but thereafter, as a conflict with the victim arose in the course of the consultative council’s activities, the Defendant was forced to leave from the victim in the car page, and (c) was engaged in a separate creation of the H Council, along

At around 16:02 on December 21, 2009, the Defendant: (a) published a statement on the “H Council” Internet Niber P.C. on the victim’s Internet N.C., “I.D.” on the following occasions: (b) 16:02; and (c) made it easy for many other people to see that they were married; (d) he was able to see that he was her. He was able to her. Although it was predicted, he was not aware that his death would not be perceived; and (e) published a patent insulting the victim on eight occasions in total from that date to October 21, 2010, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged as having withdrawn the complaint against the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.