logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.11.20 2014가합1525
건설장비임대료
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 65,543,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from January 7, 2014 to November 20, 2014.

Reasons

. Facts of recognition.

A. On August 26, 2013, the Plaintiff, who runs the construction machinery rental business, etc. under the trade name B, leased the following construction equipment to the Defendant at rent of KRW 80,000,000 per month (Additional Tax) and one month as the rental period.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). However, an agreement was made to deduct the monthly salary of KRW 5,000,000 from the rent for the article of equipment.

The product size and quantity file drick DH758 leverc 48m leverc 0609 Scing 0609 40m Scing 0570*6m 7 leverc 150 p/neverc 150 p. neverc, two boxes for one mixing Warsaw plant (satch), six steel plates (30T). Electric wires/Equipments necessary for electric wires.

B. After the lapse of a one-month lease term under the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to extend the lease term and did not reach an extension agreement while the Defendant continued to use it, and thus, the Plaintiff collected construction equipment at the construction site on October 13, 2013.

C. Meanwhile, with respect to the rent for the construction equipment from August 26, 2013 to September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to pay KRW 84,130,000, plus KRW 7,413,00,00, which is the sum of KRW 80,000, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 600, KRW 400, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 60, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 400, KRW 600, KRW 400, KRW 300, KRW 400, KRW 4000, KRW 200, KRW 4006, KRW 2004.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), Evidence Nos. 7, Witness C's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim.

arrow