Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s establishment of each right to collateral security as to the real estate indicated in the attached Form 1) on December 20, 208 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) shall be the real estate indicated in the attached Form C from December 20, 208.
(C) On January 23, 2009, the Seoul Eastern District Court (Seoul Eastern District Court) purchased and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the receipt No. 7798 of January 23, 2009, and on the same day, the Korea Standards Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “SC Japan Bank”).
B) As to the apartment of this case, the mortgagee, the debtor, and the maximum debt amount were to be KRW 324,00,000,000, and the establishment registration was completed on January 23, 2009 by the Gangseo-dong District Court of Seoul, Dong District Court No. 7799. On December 11, 2009, the mortgagee decided to reduce the maximum debt amount of the right to collateral security to KRW 240,00,000 (hereinafter “the right to collateral security of this case”).
(2) On February 17, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded a mortgage-backed contract with the Industrial Bank of Korea with the Industrial Bank of Korea, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) where the Plaintiff had been employed as a representative director, and the maximum debt amount of which are KRW 88,00,000, and concluded the mortgage-backed contract with the Seoul Eastern District Court (Seoul Eastern District Court) as the receipt of No. 11927, Feb. 20, 2012.
(3) On February 28, 2012, the Plaintiff concluded a contract to establish a collateral between E and E, the obligor, the Plaintiff, and the maximum debt amount of which are KRW 100,000,000, and completed the registration of the establishment of the collateral security (hereinafter “instant three-mortgage”). On February 28, 2012, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of the collateral security (hereinafter “instant three-mortgage”).
(4) On July 6, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a mortgage-backed contract with the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, the debtor D, the maximum debt amount of which is KRW 130,000,00 with the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, and then on July 11, 2012, the Seoul Eastern District Court (Seoul Eastern District Court).