The defendant is innocent.

1. On December 10, 2010, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the lawsuit filed for the registration of cancellation of ownership (No. 2010da15447) in Sung-dong District Court, Sung-dong District Court, Sung-dong, Sung-gu, Sung-dong, Sung-si, Sung-dong, Sung-dong, and testified. The facts were as follows: ① by 1964, Gwangju-si D (hereinafter “instant land”); ② thereafter, G was reclaimed as dry field; ② thereafter, G was occupied as dry field for 1951, not for Gangwon-do directors; ② G was occupied as a dry field for 1951, but for G was removed. However, “(i) the above D was the land 4th anniversary of the I house, and was the Defendant’s testimony to the effect that it was contrary to the above 17-18th of the G house.”

2. Determination

A. The testimony concerning the existence of a cemetery is acknowledged by the evidence investigated by this court, namely, that the land category of this case was changed from the grave site to the previous land before August 15, 1961, and H testified to the purport that the grave was almost flatized in the above civil procedure, and the statement of E was made from H. The statement of J and K was merely a fact that H was formed and obtained from the J, K, or its own consciousness, and H voluntarily testified to the purport that “the fact that a grave had existed in this case’s land exists” in the above civil procedure, and in light of other circumstances such as H’s statement attitude and process of the civil procedure, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone testified that the defendant was false testimony made in the defendant’s memory, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

B. The portion of the testimony concerning G is examined by the court.