All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the Defendant F’s grounds of appeal, the lower court convicted Defendant F of the facts charged against Defendant F, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the principle of deception and the principle of no accusation in fraud, thereby infringing Defendant F’s right of defense, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment

2. Although the petition of appeal submitted by Defendant G on Defendant G’s grounds of appeal contains errors in the misapprehension of legal principles in the judgment of the court below, it did not state specific grounds for appeal. Furthermore, Defendant G merely did not state the grounds for appeal, or did not consider Defendant G as the subject of judgment ex officio, and it did not constitute a legitimate ground of appeal.

Meanwhile, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed

Defendant

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against G, the argument that the sentence is too inappropriate is too unreasonable because it did not fully consider the conditions of sentencing in the sentencing judgment of the court below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.