Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2016, the Defendant was unable to borrow KRW 5 million from the victim B to repay his/her debt for about five months due to Party B’s pregnancy. On January 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested the same through the Kakakao Stockholm to sell his/her name by requesting the same through the Kakao Stockholm on or around 05:00 on January 20, 2017; and (b) was in a way to sell money by opening the handphone in the name; and (c) around 06:00 on February 5, 2017, the victim’s photograph and the KaKakao Stockholm ine conversation were cut back to the face in the future and made it possible for the victim to sell money to the same for Party B to use it as a 600 Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Ka.

ㅎㅎ 봅시다

V. L. L. L. L. only one eye in one eye

‘Along with the loan of money or by other similar means, it was extremely harmful to the privacy of people by forcing them to prepare the repayment fund.

2. 피고인은 2017. 2. 5. 06:47 경 온라인 SNS 인 ' 페이스 북' 을 통해 피해자의 사진을 첨부하여 " 부천 C 사는 빠른 93 B 개 그지 씨 팔년 아 돈 갚을 능력도 안 되면서 빌릴 땐 카드 값 대출금 갚는다고

The sound of a petling shall be "I am fully sold even if I do not fully pay the money" and "I am fully sold."

In the narrow sense that the Korean director who had a director is also narrow because he or she shows his or her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son'

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a process certificate, a detailed statement of transactions, a mobile phone closure and a photograph of a cell phone closure;

1. Article 15(1) of the Act on the Fair Debt Collection Practices and Articles 15(1) and 9 subparag. 1 of the same Act (the point of and the choice of fines for debt collection through intimidation) against criminal facts, and Article 15 of the same Act.