logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.10.06 2016고단1364
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 29, 2015, the Defendant damaged the said taxi to the extent that the repair cost is KRW 315,698,000, when she gets off and arrived at the destination of the taxi, she gets off and went off with the victim E, a taxi engineer, who was not under the influence of alcohol even after having arrived at the destination of the taxi, and she was destroyed by breaking the FYF Hastnel and the rear gate, etc., which is behind the top back of the front penter of the taxi owned by the victim, to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 315,698.

2. Around November 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender, such as property damage and damage, at the office of the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Police Station G Team at 311, 84, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Intimidation”); and (b) threatened the victim E (55 years of age) with the person who was a dangerous object.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

3. On November 29, 2015, at around 03:27, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on the first floor of the Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 311-ro, 84, and the release was made after the arrest of a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason; (b) when the fire extinguisher sender on the wall of the corridor installed on the wall of the corridor was drinking on the ground that alcohol was under the influence of alcohol, it was destroyed by the Defendant’s destruction at the time of drinking; and (c) continuously sealed the free entrance of the first floor, and removed the door door fixed on the market and the front door at the market.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A H statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each sentence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order.

arrow