logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.22 2013고합591
현주건조물방화미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Daejeon District Court's astronomical Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 201.

On April 23, 2004, between around 17:00 and around 19:00, the Defendant tried to extinguish the victim's clothes 20 to a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with a fluent with the fluent with the fluent with the fluent with the flus

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each investigation report (in cases of attaching structures at the place of occurrence, 2004, specific suspect);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to judgment);

1. Article 174 and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 10259, Apr. 15, 2010) concerning the pertinent provision of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment for a limited term;

1. Articles 26 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for attempted suspension and mitigation;

1. The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes (trade between the crimes of attempted fire-prevention and the special larceny, etc. of which judgment has become final and conclusive);

1. The latter part of Article 39 (1) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (unfavorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act) of the risk of causing many victims or causing a large amount of damage (finite circumstances) of his/her own risk to discontinue the crime, to the extent of damage, to the minor extent of damage, to the

arrow