logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.08.11 2020나180
청구이의
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the judgment of "paragraph (2)" is added to the judgment of "paragraph (4) of the first instance judgment under the fourth instance judgment; and (b) it is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment except where "paragraph (5) (2)" is deemed to be "paragraph (3)"; (c) thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. [2] Even if the above letter of payment (Evidence (Evidence (Evidence (Evidence (1)) is not altered by the plaintiff, even though the above letter of payment was not altered by the plaintiff, the circumstance that the plaintiff and the defendant made a final agreement not to separately set the termination date of payment (Evidence 4, 2017), which was set out in the original letter of this case, is favorable to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff bears the burden of proof; and (d) the plaintiff and the defendant do not have any specific evidence that the plaintiff did not have any effect on the letter of this case, and there is no other evidence submitted by the court.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the above scope of recognition and the remainder is dismissed as there is no ground. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as there is no ground for appeal.

arrow