The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s request regarding the attachment order case and the protective observation order case when it rendered a judgment of conviction on the part of the defendant, and the part of the attachment order and the protective observation order case were appealed only by the defendant. Thus, there is no benefit of appeal regarding the attachment order case and the protective observation order part.

Therefore, notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 21-8 and 9(8) of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders, the part of the judgment of the court below concerning attachment order and protective observation order is excluded, and the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the case of the defendant.

2. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the gist of the grounds of appeal.

3. It is recognized that the defendant divided his mistake, and that the defendant agreed with the victim.

However, the crime of this case is an indecent act committed by a minor under the age of 13 who was found in the defendant's house with a pet dog and found in the defendant's house, and the nature of the crime is not good. The crime of this case showed considerable mental suffering and pain to the victim due to the crime of this case, and considering the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.