The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 26 years of age) were related with each other.

On September 3, 2019, from around 00:20 to around 00:35 on the same day, the Defendant assaulted the victim by means of breaking the victim at hand due to the Defendant’s shoulder, and breaking the sound into the Defendant’s shoulder, as the victim was heeped in front of the store of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” in front of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. The witness B asserts that the defendant and his defense counsel do not have assaulted the victim as stated in the facts charged by the defendant, as in the 112 Report Report No. 112 Report No. 112 Report No. 112 Report No.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim is consistently making a statement about the defendant's assault. Although the victim was under treatment due to mental illness, such as stimulative disorder, etc. around 2008, the victim did not determine that the victim caused the victim's false statement with regard to the part of the assault in light of the content of the statement in the investigative agency and the attitude of statement in this court. According to the diagnosis, the victim appeared to have shown symptoms such as summons and the network, etc. due to the instant assault, and the victim was hospitalized in the mental hospital and was treated at the mental hospital, and the victim appears to have testified in favor of himself/herself. However, the victim's testimony about the monetary problem between the defendant and the victim cannot be seen to have followed the credibility of the testimony about the said assault. Although the victim did not contact again after the instant assault and talk between the parties, the victim and the victim was given and talked, and the victim did not cause serious damage to the victim.