1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, it is accepted by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each “L, M, and N land” in Section 4, Section 10-11, and Section 14, respectively, shall be considered as “R, S, T, U, L, M, M, and N land”.

The following shall be added to the 10th sentence of the first instance court and the 4 to 5th sentence.

In addition, considering the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in Eul evidence Nos. 21 through 23 (including the number of each branch number), as a whole, R, S, T, U, L, M, and N are land adjoining to K and back roads, while the surface of the road falls under the luminous angle, as the land adjoining to K and Q, it can be recognized that the surface of the road falls under the luminous incineration. However, as long as the condition of the surface adjoining to the road of the instant complex is different from the surface of the road of the instant complex, the land price of the two land cannot be different. In addition, in the case of the instant land, the defendant is calculated as 38,880,00 square meters, and the surrounding land price is calculated as 37,610,000 square meters, and the judgment of the court below that determined as 37,610,000 square meters or more in consideration of equity with the land price is dismissed as it is without merit.