The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment and one hundred thousand won of surcharge) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is that the defendant repented his mistake through imprisonment for more than two months and returned to society in good faith. The amount of the penphone administered by the defendant is less than the amount of the penphone, cooperation in the investigation of narcotics cases, such as arresting the criminal who committed narcotics by the defendant's information, the fact that the defendant's health status is not good, and that there is a family member to support is favorable to the defendant.

However, considering the fact that the medication of narcotics causes serious harm to society and the state’s soundness due to its toxicity, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 months in 2008 due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for the same crime in 2008, and 3 years and 2 months have passed since the completion of the enforcement of the sentence, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again after the lapse of 3 years and 2 months from the completion of the enforcement of the sentence, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and environment, as indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, it cannot

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.