logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.22 2013가단84403
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From May 6, 2013, the above A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The conclusion of a construction contract and the default of construction works 1) the UNFCCC Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “UNFCCC Development”).

(C) On the ground outside Busan Jin-gu, Busan and seven parcels, the main complex building with a scale of 102 households (hereinafter “instant apartment building”).

A) New Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Tangdae-mul General Construction”), around May 2003, 2003.

2) On October 2005, the construction of the instant apartment was ordered to construct the instant apartment and entered into a subcontract with multiple companies, including the Defendant who operates D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) such as B, and the central river (hereinafter referred to as “central river”) and the urban electricity (hereinafter referred to as “urban electricity”) and the construction of the instant apartment (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”) and the construction of the instant apartment was in default around October 2005.

B. 1) The subcontractors, including the Defendant, form a consultative body of subcontractors, constitute a consultative body. The subcontractors, including the Defendant, were elected as the representative firm of the consultative body. On November 2005, the subcontractors, including the Defendant, acquired all of their claims for the development of the United Nations academic development. On December 10, 2005, in the name of the third representative firm, the subcontractors concluded an agreement with the UN Academic Development with the main contents that “the instant construction works are completed at the expense of the subcontractors, and the United Nations Development completed the instant construction works with the aim of securing the obligation for the payment of the construction cost.” 2) The subcontractors, including the Defendant, who were awarded a subcontract for the construction of the instant construction works, such as the passage, fright, dump, and verbridges, among the instant construction works, directly borne the construction cost, and completed the construction work around December 206.

3) The subcontractors are creditors of the above 3 representative companies (presidential, urban electric, central sub-committeeed, etc.).

arrow