logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.11.10 2019나2055157
직위해제처분 무효확인 등
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is the same as the part of the claim for monetary payment during the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the case as mentioned below, and thus, citing this in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The termination of the Plaintiff’s termination under Section 5(d)(2) of the first instance judgment on the part used in the dismissal shall be deemed to be “the termination of the Defendant.”

From 12th to 7th of the first instance judgment, the defendant's report was rejected on the ground that the dismissal from office is restricted pursuant to Article 54-5 of the Private School Act, and the procedure of removal from office was announced."

Under the 8th page of the judgment of the first instance, the 3rd class “15” is dismissed as “15,22,” and the 4th class “each fact inquiry results with respect to the first instance court and the head of the Office of Education of Gyeonggi-do used in this Court” is added.

The term "finite" in the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted.

From the 9th 10th 12th 10th 10th 12th 12th 12th 10th 1st 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 1st 1st 2th 1st 2th 1st 2th 1st 2th 2nd 201

The 15th judgment of the first instance court "claim for Damages" in the 15th judgment is dismissed as "preliminary Claim", and the 16th to 16th judgment is as follows.

In addition, the fact that the defendant filed a dismissal report with the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education immediately after receiving the resignation from the plaintiff on October 5, 2016, but the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education rejected the defendant's report on the ground that the office of education in Gyeonggi-do is in progress an investigation against the plaintiff is being conducted is the same as the above, and Eul's evidence and evidence Nos. 19 through 22.

arrow