logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.11.19 2015고단2529
폭행등
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who works as the deputy head of the law office B, the victim C is a taxi engineer, and the victim D is a police officer. A.

Around 02:40 on September 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by the victim C, a taxi engineer who stops on the way ahead of the “Fjuk point” located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, without any justifiable reason, on two occasions in his/her hands.

B. For the reason of paragraph (1), the Defendant’s insultd the victim D, who was a police officer reported 112 and called the victim D’s chest to ask his personal information and telephone number to the Defendant, was openly insultingly insulting to the Defendant before citizens, on the following grounds: (a) the victim D, who was a police officer, was tightly tightly pushed the victim D’s chest to ask for his/her personal information and telephone number twice; (b) the left face of the victim D, was tightly pushed once, and hicked; and (c) n was a governance of the police.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Article 260 (1) to the facts charged: No person shall be punished pursuant to Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act: A judgment dismissing an application for withdrawal of a complaint and non-prosecution of a punishment filed on October 22, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

(b) Matters subject to prosecution subject to prosecution under Article 311 of the Criminal Act: Cancellation of complaint under Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act: Judgment dismissing a written withdrawal of complaint filed on October 19, 2015, which is after the institution of public prosecution in this case: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow