All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the court below reversed the judgment of the court of first instance that found the Defendants guilty on the following grounds: (a) the violation of the Medical Service Act and the violation of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the judgment of the court of first instance”) No. 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the judgment of the court of first instance”), Defendant B’s violation of the Medical Service Act; (b) the violation of the Medical Service Act and the violation of the attached Table No. 1 through No. 6, 30, 31 of the crime sight list No. 1 through No. 6, 30, 31 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the judgment of the court of first instance”); (c) the violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act and the violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act as stated in the attached Table No. 7 through No. 14, 32, 33 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “the judgment of the court of first instance”); and (d) the violation of the indictment against Defendant F.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of the crime of taking property in breach of trust and the

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.