1. Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant B, C, D, and E respectively, KRW 9,148,90 and each of them on August 22, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff, as an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with F in relation to the F-owned vehicles, agreed to compensate for the loss in the event that G (F’s father) who is the insured was injured by the non-insurance motor vehicle at the time of entering into the said insurance contract.

Around 21:00 on June 26, 2013, the network H (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) driven a non-registered CITI 100 E-wheeled vehicle (hereinafter “the instant E-wheeled vehicle”) and shocked G with the instant E-wheeled vehicle, which had been driven by a new e-mailed vehicle in front of the payment for the Korean War on June 25, 2015, in front of the payment for commemorative in the Korean War, which was located in the Sungnam-gu, dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Y.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, G suffered bodily injury, such as double aggregates that require approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment, duplicating cupages of cupages, and duplicating supages of supages.

On the other hand, in addition to the plaintiff, four insurance companies such as Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Tong Fire"), including the plaintiff, concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the other relatives of G such as I, and entered into an accident security agreement with the non-insurance vehicle.

Samsung Fire: (a) deemed that the ratio of G’s negligence in the instant accident constitutes 20%; (b) paid 80% of the medical expenses to G as insurance proceeds; and (c) the Plaintiff paid KRW 50,319,000 of the insurance money to be borne by the Plaintiff according to the internal share ratio 1/5 of the double insurers to Samsung Fire until August 21, 2015.

The Deceased died immediately after the instant accident, and the Defendant A and his children, Defendant B, C, D, and E jointly inherited the deceased’s property.

(Defendant A 3/11 Shares, the remaining Defendants 2/11 Shares). / [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1 through 11, Eul 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the fact inquiry results, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the plaintiff's claim, the deceased, who is the driver of the two-wheeled vehicle, of this case.