1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,451,281 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from February 17, 2016 to February 15, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C is D New Airport No. 18:30 on February 17, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”). D New Airport No. 30 on February 17, 2016

ii) The Frighting Car of the Plaintiff’s driver (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) that was driven by the Plaintiff’s driver while driving a one-lane road in front of the Empic processing site in the Nam-gu, East-gu. Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

) The back portion of the Defendant vehicle was shocked with the front portion of the Defendant vehicle, and due to the shock, the Plaintiff vehicle shocked the rear part of the G high-est vehicle running ahead of the Plaintiff vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury, such as the sofinite base, the scinate base, the scinate base, and the scinate bed.

3) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence No. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table of calculation of damages shall be the same, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 5, 6, 8 through 13, 15, and 16, the result of the physical examination entrusted to the president of the Hat Hospital by this court, the result of the order to submit taxation data on the Sejong Sejong Tax Code by this court, the fact that is significant, the rule of experience, and the purport of

(a) Personal information on lost income: A list of damages calculated in attached Form 1.