logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.27 2014나2047113
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, around July 2006, means the part (197.41 square meters) indicated as the fourth floor on the registry concerning the instant building on three floors (60 square meters) of Gangnam-gu Seoul and N Ground Buildings (hereinafter “instant building”) between Defendant B and Defendant C (hereinafter “instant building”).

Among the 40 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”), the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement to lease the 40 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”) and the main contents are as follows:

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). Article 1 of the lease of the above real estate is to pay the lease deposit and rent as follows.

Deposit: Costs of rent of KRW 100,000: KRW 3,000,000 for rent of KRW 100,000: Value-added tax separately: KRW 50,000 for intermediate payment including cost of facilities: The remainder of KRW 120,000,000 for intermediate payment including cost of KRW 120,000: The lessor shall deliver the above real estate to the lessee by July 2006, and the lease (monthly) duration shall be seven years from the date of delivery.

Article 3 The lessee may not change the use, structure, etc. of the above real estate or sub-lease, transfer the right of lease or offer the security, and use it for any purpose other than the lease purpose without the consent of the lessor.

Article 4 The lessee shall not recognize the lessor's premium for any reason, such as facility costs, etc., and shall restore it to the original state at the time of lease when the lease period expires and deliver it to the lessor.

Article 9 The maintenance and management of the building and the occupants of the building shall not park and shall be governed by the provisions of the building building.

In the event that the deposit under this contract is not paid in full at the time of occupancy, this contract shall be terminated (a part of it shall be paid in consultation with each other at the time of payment of parking personnel's benefits).

After the conclusion of the above lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid the lease deposit of KRW 200,000,000 and the facility cost of KRW 100,000,000 to Defendant B and C, and operated the skin management room from August 23, 2006 after receiving the delivery of the instant store from the said Defendants.

arrow