A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:20 on September 3, 2014, the Defendant was driving a F F F F FFD car, and the Defendant was driving along two lanes between the two-lane roads around the 112.5km away from the Lane at a point of 112.5km away from the outer cycle of the Sinpo-si, Yanpo-si.

At the time, there was a duty of care to operate the steering system in a safe manner by reducing the speed as a person engaged in driving service and keeping it well according to the traffic situation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in driving, and the victim G (the age of 43) driven by the three-lanes in the front direction of the Defendant’s driving car, which was driven by the victim G (the age of 43).

Although the Defendant suffered from an injury, such as scopical salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act lies on an expressway without taking measures, such as causing a serious traffic accident (an estimated amount of damage caused by substitute items, approximately 13 million won), and aiding the victim, and the nature of the crime is not that of the crime.

In addition, the fact that the defendant had a criminal record of drunk driving twice, and the defendant seems to have escaped for the concealment of drunk driving.