logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.09 2015고단769
향토예비군설치법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is a homeland reserve force member.

1. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up of homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the 3879 unit unit of the Army, which was sent to the training site of homeland reserve forces located in the Seocho-si in Gwangju-si on March 22, 2012 from the Defendant’s house located in the 103th unit of Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si on March 22, 2012.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

2. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the 3879 unit unit of the Army, which caused the third carried-over training at the homeland reserve forces training site located in the Seocho-si in Gwangju City from March 20, 2012 to March 21, 2012 from March 20, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the 38

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

3. On March 8, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up of the homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the army unit of the 3879 unit in the name of the second unit commander of the army reserve forces training place located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City, causing secondary supplementary training.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

4. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant received a notice of convening homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the army unit 3879, which was sent to the homeland reserve forces training site located in the Seocho-si in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si on March 7, 2013, which would result in the second supplementary training for the whole period carried forward.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

5. Around June 4, 2013, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for homeland reserve forces training in the name of the first unit commander of the Army, which was attached to the first unit commander of the 3879 unit commander, which caused the second supplementary training to be carried forward at the homeland reserve forces training site located in the Seocho-Eup in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si.

(b).

arrow