logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.01.07 2013고단1466
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person with visual disability of Grade I, who operates an Eanma treatment center located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-si.

No one shall commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes.

Nevertheless, at around 16:05 on March 18, 2013, the defendant received 1.80,000 won from F who is a customer at the place of the massage procedure, and arranged sexual traffic women who are sexual intercourse with the name of the victim at the place of the massage procedure, which is equipped with shower facilities, simplified bed, and water bags.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. A written accusation;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report and investigation report;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for a suspended sentence;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, even though the defendant had served as a criminal of the same kind, again commits the crime of this case, the punishment shall be imposed concurrently with imprisonment and fine, taking into account the size of the crime of this case, the profits acquired by the crime, the nature of the crime, etc.

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, from February 7, 2012 to October 24, 2013, engaged in the arrangement of commercial sex acts.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is a confession of this part of the facts charged in the investigation agency and this court, but each statement on the investigation report (a specific business period and a business registration certificate, etc. attached thereto) and the attached documents is merely a fact that the Defendant started the business of the massage treatment office of this case from February 7, 2012, and thus, it is admitted as evidence to reinforce the confession.

arrow