The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one-year imprisonment and four-year imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and his mistake is repented in depth, and it appears that the degree of injury suffered by the victim D due to the robbery of this case is not very serious.

However, the crime of this case is committed on the other hand, however, by using a stroke m, which is a local mental medicine, so that the defendant could not resist the victim D by using the stroke m, and then, by forceing one 2 million won in total at the market price of the above victim's possession, causing the victim to injure the victim's disguised infection in treatment days, etc., and by carrying a stroke m, which is a local mental medicine, and by stealing the total market price of the victim H et al. over 11 times in total, the crime of this case is very poor in quality in light of the means, methods and patterns of the crime, and the frequency of the larceny crime. The defendant committed the larceny crime of this case without considering the following facts: the defendant's motive and method of the crime of this case; the defendant's punishment of the crime of this case, including six times punishment for the same kind of larceny; and the defendant's motive and method of the crime of this case's injury to the victim's environment; and the defendant's sentencing guideline and sentencing guidelines of the crime of this case.