1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A for KRW 26,67,518, and KRW 3,000,000 to the plaintiff B, and KRW 2,00,000 to the plaintiff C, and each of the above amounts.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is a D bus owned by the subsidiary passenger company (hereinafter “Defendant bus”).

(2) On July 7, 2015, Plaintiff B’s spouse, Plaintiff C’s driver, and Nonparty C’s driver of the Defendant bus: (a) Non-Party E, the driver of the Defendant bus, opened the rear door door door of G in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, along with two-lanes of passenger school distance from the area of the new global department store on July 14:40, 2015; (b) while Plaintiff A, the passenger of Defendant bus, was proceeding along the two-lanes of the passenger, the passenger of the passenger of the passenger bus, the passenger of the passenger of the passenger bus, or the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of Nonparty 1 and the passenger of the passenger of the passenger of Nonparty 1.

(3) The plaintiff A suffered injury due to the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as "the instant accident"). The plaintiff A suffered injury, such as satisfying of satisfyed satfyed satfy. [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator unless there are special circumstances.

C. However, according to the above recognition of liability, the Plaintiff’s negligence was found to have been neglected even though it was necessary to safely check the progress of the vehicle driven on the three-lanes in a bus parked on the two-lanes. The Plaintiff’s mistake caused the damage caused by the instant accident.