1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. An aquaculture under the authorization of the Gyeonggi-do Governor's implementation plan on May 8, 2006.

1. Basic facts

A. The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do (1) The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do) is the former Urban Development Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8970, Mar. 21, 2008; hereinafter the same applies).

Pursuant to the Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2004-244 of August 28, 2004 (hereinafter “instant business area”) the amount of 987,940 square meters, which is 3440 square meters of daily meal 344,00 Dong-dong, Seoyang-si, Yongsan-si, Seoul, is “a high-style urban development zone” (hereinafter

The Plaintiff was designated and publicly announced as an urban development project under the replotting method in the instant project area (hereinafter “instant project”).

(2) In order to implement the project, each real estate listed in the real estate list in the instant project area (hereinafter “instant state-owned land”) was managed by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (hereinafter “the Ministry of Construction and Transportation”) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (hereinafter “the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry”) but was disused and changed into the Ministry of Finance and Economy (the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) around October 2007. The Defendant is entrusted by the Ministry of Finance and Economy with the management of the instant state-owned land in charge of the management and disposal of the instant land.

B. On May 8, 2006, the Governor of Gyeonggi-do changed the area of the instant business area to 98,224 square meters (re-aled to 989,377 square meters again on May 31, 2007) and attached the condition that "to pay and implement various opinions and charges, etc. to the relevant agencies and relevant departments", the Governor of Gyeonggi-do approved the instant business implementation plan. The Plaintiff was designated as the project implementer of the instant business, and publicly notified as the Gyeonggi-do Notice No. 2006-5069 of May 11, 2006. 2) The Governor of Gyeonggi-do announced the plan as the project implementer of the instant business. The Governor of Gyeonggi-do should gratuitously vest the Plaintiff in the public facilities, etc. owned by the Republic of Korea in the instant business area, the use of which is abolished by the implementation of the instant