(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고단1423

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고단1423

공갈미수

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict at the Seoul Eastern District Court on February 12, 2015 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 4, 2015, at around 11:40, the Defendant requested the victim E (the 19-year-old) (the 19-year-old) who is an employee of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” to provide five diseases free of charge after drinking alcohol together with female Domins, but the victim refused to provide such demand, the victim’s face is able to take her hand, and the victim’s face is her at one time, and the victim’s face is her part, and the victim’s face is her part, and the victim’s face is her part, and the victim’s face is her part, and the victim’s face is her part, and the victim’s face is her part at the Gangnam-dong-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant took part in the funeral service at this time, and if the Defendant did not immediately respond to the Defendant’s request, the Defendant was engaged in the same illegal business as the Defendant’s body.

The Defendant, by assaulting and threatening the victim, attempted to get 30,000 won or more at the market price from the victim drinking, but the victim refused to do so and attempted to report to the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Business registration certificate or business permission certificate;

1. Previous convictions: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 352 and 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant denies the crime of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, according to the consistent statement between the victim’s investigative agency and the court, the facts charged can be found guilty.

The defendant was changed from the police to the beer service, but the victim was not the victim.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.10.25 2012고합341

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.10.18 2016고정433

-서울남부지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고합94

-수원지방법원 2012.11.07 2012고단4439

-서울남부지방법원 2012.11.07 2012고단3581