All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The above-mentioned sentence of the prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant led to the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that he deposited the money to the damaged police officer in the trial of the party are favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, in the instant case, the police officers who were dispatched to the site after receiving a report, and thereafter to the police station, who are dangerous objects by searching for the police station, and who are performing official duties with oil, and the nature of the crime is very not good. The Defendant has been punished for violent crimes, and the Defendant has committed several times, and is disadvantageous to the police officers who did not agree with the victim.

In addition, taking account of the following factors: Defendant’s age, sex, occupation and environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable as it is deemed that the Defendant’s punishment is too heavy, and thus, Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.