A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:30 on January 4, 2020, the Defendant collected food waste in front of the “C” road located in the Seogugu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and damaged the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 764,696, by putting the victim D (ma, 35 years old), who was parked therein, left a panion of the E-car owned by the victim D (ma, 35 years old).

2. On January 4, 2020, at around 03:02, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and received 112 reports, received the notification of personal information from the police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the National Police Station F District Unit of the Daegu Police Station, and heard that he would be informed of personal information from the police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the National Police Agency F District Unit of the Republic of Korea Police Station, and made a sound that he would be “Icele”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each police statement of G, H, and D, an investigation report (the other party investigation of a shote I) to the written statement of each police officer;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and eradicate the light of public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant has a record of being punished once by a fine due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case and repented his mistake, that the victim did not want punishment under the agreement with the victim D of the crime of causing property damage, that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and that there was no other record of punishment, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined as set forth in the text,