logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고정2326
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2013, around 22:00, the Defendant driven a car cM520-20 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.142% of alcohol concentration on a road of approximately 4 kilometers in front of the 162-18 Mao-dong, Mao-si, Mao-si, Mao-si, Mao-si, 162-18.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on proper initiative of, and reports on the statement of status of, a prime driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car in the amount of CSM520.

On June 18, 2013, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 22:00, and driving the front road of the 162-18 long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term high-

The driver of any motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of the course by checking well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim's Ethrop mathr's Ethrop drive, which is sent to the right-hand left-hand turn at the same direction as the left-hand turn, has contacted the left-hand side and the left-hand side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the property worth KRW 640,000 as repair fees with the right side of the above damaged vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and escaped without taking any measure.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, due to road conditions, the Defendant could not stop immediately after the accident, but the Defendant sent a signal to the victim and took measures after leaving the vehicle at a place far away from the accident site.

The defendant is involved in the accident according to the following: the witness stand, the witness D's legal statement, and the statement made to the investigation agency.

arrow