Text
1. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant’s decision that the Plaintiff was not eligible for veteran’s compensation against the Plaintiff is revoked.
2...
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 30, 2010, the Plaintiff’s son B (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the 306 Supplementary Team in the Army. On April 2, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the 8th Sick Education Team and received five weeks’ education, and then transferred from May 7, 2010 to the 8rd Class C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “instant unit”) and served as K-3 copies.
B. While the Deceased had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had had
Since then, on June 23, 2010, the deceased was assigned to a major headquarters and served as a combat duty support soldier. On June 27, 2011, the deceased committed suicide with the roof up to 13.4m above the roof of 13.4m by using a fixed bridge connected with the roof inside a military unit around June 27, 201.
C. On April 14, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State pursuant to the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”).
) A person eligible for veteran’s compensation shall be deemed to have applied for the registration of a person eligible for veteran’s compensation together pursuant to Article 4(2). On September 12, 2014, the Defendant did not engage in any other cruel act, etc., and performed specially excessive tasks beyond the general scope of military service.
There are no objective data to confirm that the deceased was forced to suffer excessive stress by working in a special working environment or in a special working environment, and thus, the deceased was self-harmed or killed due to the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, security, or the protection of people's lives and property.
In relation to the performance of duties or education and training of the military, it is necessary to do so.