Text
On May 13, 2019, the defendant rejected the application for approval of the Korea-U.D general industrial complex plan against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. In order to actively respond to the special conditions of export for special vehicles in Korea, the Plaintiffs were unable to establish a general industrial complex (hereinafter “instant industrial complex”) in terms of forest land E population E in the situation of the wife, in order to promote productivity efficiency and business rationalization by relocating and integrating the production bases scattered in the Japanese Won-si in Yongsan-si in order to promote production efficiency and business rationalization, and maximize the collapse effect through production technology, export information exchange, etc. due to the cluster of companies producing special vehicles.
B. For this purpose, on June 21, 2017, the Plaintiff Company A submitted to the Defendant an investment intent pursuant to Article 7 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Simplification of Authorization and Permission Procedures for Industrial Complexes (hereinafter “Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act”). On September 19, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs, the Defendant, Gyeonggi-do, and other related agencies of their opinions on the investment intent, and consulted with the Defendant, Gyeonggi-do, and other related agencies for the creation of the industrial complex in this case.
C. On December 27, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed an application with the Defendant for the approval of the industrial complex plan of this case pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act. The Defendant, pursuant to Article 9 of the Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act, announced and perused the industrial complex plan and strategic environmental impact assessment (the draft) from December 29, 2017 to January 26, 2018, and held a joint briefing session on January 9, 2018 for residents adjacent to the industrial complex of this case.
From December 28, 2017 to January 9, 2019, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant conducted strategic environmental impact assessment after consultation with the relevant administrative agencies to approve the industrial complex plan of this case pursuant to Articles 10 and 23 of the Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act.
E. Since then, the Gyeonggi-do Local Industrial Complex Planning Deliberation Committee (hereinafter “Deliberation Committee”) deliberated on the application for approval of the instant industrial complex plan on March 20, 2019 pursuant to Article 14 of the Industrial Complex Fire-Fighting Act, and rejected the application for approval of the industrial complex plan for the following reasons, and thereafter, on April 2, 2019 to the Defendant.