logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.11.26 2019가단221608
손해배상(위자료) 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 10, 1985, the Plaintiff A married with the deceased E (hereinafter “the deceased”) on and around October 22, 2009, but was married by agreement on October 22, 2009, and Plaintiff B (FF) and C (G) under the chain.

B. On February 28, 2011, the Defendant married with the Deceased, and had H(I) and J(I) between E and E before marriage.

C. The Deceased died on December 28, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant asserted from around 1995 that the Plaintiff began with the deceased and continued to be in inhumane relationship until October 22, 2009, when the Plaintiff A divorced from the deceased.

On September 1, 1997, the defendant invadedd the plaintiffs' residence, stolen goods, and threatened the plaintiff A with sexual intercourses with the deceased by taking the plaintiff into a hotel with sexual intercourses with the deceased, and threatened the plaintiff A with sexual intercourses, and bullying continuously.

피고는 1999. 6.경 망인의 동의 없이 시험관 시술로 망인의 아이를 임신하였고, 이를 빌미로 망인으로 하여금 원고 A와 이혼하게 만들어 결국에는 원고들의 가정을 파탄에 이르게 하고 망인의 재산까지 모두 가로챘다.

In addition, the defendant attended the funeral ceremony of the deceased, and informed the deceased that H and J were the children of the deceased, and he was aware that there were other types of meals for the deceased, who was permanently stationed in the funeral ceremony, and who intentionally caused the death of the deceased before he arrive in the funeral ceremony.

Since the plaintiffs suffered mental impulses due to the defendant's above act of incompetence, intentional acts leading to the defendant's above act of incompetence, defamation against the plaintiffs, etc., the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money to the plaintiffs.

B. In addition to the facts revealed in the above basic facts, the plaintiffs' above assertion by the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs, especially the defendant from around 195.

arrow