Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above five years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

From mid-203 201 to August 201, 201, A (H) held office in the victimJ, the head office of the 6th Embridge, the head office of the Magcheon-gu, the Korean Government of the Republic of Korea, and has overall control over all the affairs including financial management. Defendant B (K) held office in the J of the Ministry of Finance and Economy for the same period, and supported Defendant A and carried out financial management and other affairs.

Although the Defendants managed the inspection money from J’s trust as the financial revenue of the inspection, and used it for the operation of the inspection and the activities of the inspection, they opened a separate account that is not registered with the headquarters of the inspection and received the money for the inspection of the new Do from the account to the said account, and used the money for personal purposes, such as money for congratulatory investigation, various living expenses, loan, etc. related to the Defendants’ door-to-door rental.

Accordingly, on September 29, 2003, the Defendants opened an account (number L) in the name of the YJ in the name of the YJ in the YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. Since that time, the Defendants arbitrarily consumed the amount of KRW 12 million by remitting it to the agricultural bank account in the name of M, which is the land of Defendant A, under the name of the owner of M, for the victim, while having received money from new Dos through the said account and kept it for the victim.

In addition, the Defendants embezzled the sum of KRW 1,226,387,762, which were in the occupational custody for the victim 49 times in total, such as the list of crimes, from that time until August 12, 201, by using them for personal purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. An interrogation protocol of the N by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against theO;

1. Each investigation report, inspection officer duty regulation, local adjustment law, attachment report to inspection budget and accounting law, attachment report to inspection table, attachment report to inspection table of passbook, attachment report to inspection table, attachment report to inspection table of deposit money in the Do Do dong Do Do Do dong Do Do Do Do