Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle B.

At around 17:45 on May 20, 2020, the Defendant proceeded with the front road of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the speed of the speed from the breadth to the breadth of the front road.

Since the place has a crosswalk where a red signal signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the way to reduce speed and check the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are well and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this to temporarily stop the red stop, and proceeded as it is, in violation of the duty to protect pedestrians, violated the duty to protect pedestrians, and then found the victim D (in this case, 44 years old) crossing the crosswalk at the right side of the direction of the direction of the proceeding late, and operated it to avoid this, but the Defendant was faced with the right bridge of the victim and the right blue part of the two-wheeled vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim D’s negligence in the course of performing the above business as follows: (a) the elbow elbow in need of treatment for about two (2) weeks; (b) the Defendant suffered a elbow

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The D’s statement argues that it does not constitute driving in violation of the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, since it does not cause the instant traffic accident in violation of the Defendant’s signal, the report on the occurrence of the traffic accident (related to the confirmation of the scene of the victim’s participation), the report on the internal investigation (related to the identity of the suspected accused) and the medical certificate, the

The proviso of Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents violates signals displayed by signal apparatus under Article 5 of the Road Traffic Act or signals such as police officers controlling traffic, or safety signs with respect to prohibition of traffic or temporary suspension.