The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment of six months and the suspension of the execution of two years and the community service order of 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Under our criminal litigation law, which takes the principle of trial-oriented and directness, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing between the first instance court and the first instance court (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In the event that the first instance court did not change the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect them (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). While the Defendant appears to have recognized and opposed to the instant criminal act, he/she appears to have agreed with the victim, the lower court appears to have determined a sentence against the Defendant, and there is no change in circumstances that could be considered in sentencing after the sentence was sentenced, in light of the motive, object, method, and form of the instant crime, etc. of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, method and method of the instant crime, and all the following circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.