A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 29, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) by the Seoul Southern District Court in Seoul, and a summary order of 5 million won for the same crime on February 1, 2013 in the Incheon District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court. On November 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1.6 months for the same crime.

[2] On November 15, 2017, the Defendant driven a coo car in the direction of alcohol 0.11% under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, from around about 200 meters from the front of the lux hotel in the ancient Do in the ancient Do of Kimpo-si to about 200 meters in the front road of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

After all, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the situation of the driver who is placed in driving, investigation report (report on the situation of the driver who is placed in driving in driving in driving), inquiry into the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, and report on

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (verification of the same type of force, etc.), and application of the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1, 44 (1) (the point of drinking) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 152 (1) and 43 (the point of driving without a license) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including circumstances favorable to the below) is against the defendant, and that he/she will trade his/her own vehicle and will not repeat the crime.

The fact that the defendant is favorable to the defendant, but the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on November 9, 2017 after he was sentenced to a fine twice due to the same drinking driving power, but the court was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to drinking on November 9, 2017, the driving of the motor vehicle in this case without being completely driven six days after the date of the judgment.